Stanley was not your average lawyer. For one, he was a black mutt with a tail that wagged at the sight of a good legal precedent. For another, he communicated entirely through a series of barks, whines, and very expressive paw gestures. His partner, a long-suffering paralegal named Brenda, was the only one who could truly translate his legal genius to the human world.
Their latest case was a doozy. The client was a timid terrier named Buster, accused of a heinous crime: the unlawful killing of a squirrel. Buster, with his trembling paws and wide, fearful eyes, insisted it was self-defense. The squirrel, he claimed through whimpers and a frantic lick to the face, had been acting erratically, threatening his yard, and demanding more nuts.
The courtroom was a tense affair. The prosecution, a haughty poodle with a pristine legal coat, argued that Buster's actions were premeditated. "Your Honor," she barked, "this was a blatant act of aggression! The victim, a humble and industrious squirrel, was merely gathering acorns for the winter. Buster's testimony is, quite frankly, nuts!"
Stanley sat at the defense table, his brow furrowed in concentration. He had to prove self-defense. He stood up, let out a deep, sonorous woof, and began his cross-examination. He first called to the stand a witness, a chubby cat named Mittens, who only stared blankly into the distance. Stanley woofed again, this time with a specific inflection, pointing a paw at the cat. Brenda quickly translated: "Mr. Stanley asks, 'Were you present at the scene of the incident?'"
Mittens simply purred.
Stanley’s face showed his frustration. He couldn't rely on this witness. He had to think outside the box. Or, rather, outside the doghouse. He got up and began to pace. He then trotted over to Buster, nudging him with his wet nose. Buster, still trembling, let out a tiny, high-pitched yelp.
A lightbulb seemed to go off over Stanley’s head. He spun around, facing the judge—a stern German Shepherd—and let out a series of short, sharp barks. Brenda, with a triumphant gleam in her eye, translated for the court.
"My client," she declared, "is a victim of circumstance! He was provoked! The squirrel wasn't gathering food; he was taunting my client. The high-pitched yelp you just heard is a common distress signal for terriers when confronted with a hostile, chattering squirrel! My client's reaction was a natural, instinctual response!"
The courtroom fell silent. The poodle lawyer's jaw dropped. The judge looked at Buster, then at Stanley, then back at Buster. The terrier, sensing a shift in the wind, gave a small, confident wag of his tail.
The judge, after a long pause, looked at Stanley. He gave a single, firm nod. "Case dismissed."
A roar of applause erupted from the gallery, filled with a mix of proud dogs and confused humans. Stanley, ever the professional, simply wagged his tail, shook Buster’s paw, and trotted out of the courtroom, ready for his next case. After all, justice waits for no mutt.
Comments
0 comments
Please sign in to leave a comment.